Sarah Gooding
Over the weekend, a post regarding’s as yet unannounced pricing changes went viral on Hacker News. In a post titled “What are you doing,” one user identified as “VM” expressed concerns about the pricing, which has changed from five plans to two plans, and slashed storage on the free tier from 3GB to 500MB.
“At some point late last week, WordPress replaced all of the paid plans with a single ‘Pro’ plan and reduced the storage on the free plan 6x, from 3 GB to 500 MB,” VM wrote. “It also imposed a traffic ceiling on both plans where none existed: 10,000 visits a month and 100,000 visits a month (and it hasn’t said anything about overages – so far).”
Other users took to the forums to express frustrations with the new pricing. Although representatives have confirmed that the storage and traffic limits should only affect new sites, many long-time users have reported that their storage has been cut back to 500MB. This may be a bug in the rollout but at the time of publication, has not published a public notice the price changes beyond updating the pricing page.
In the absence of communication about the change, VM speculated that it may be a cascading effect of the block editor changing how well commercial themes can be monetized:
With the benefit of hindsight, perhaps we should have seen this coming: the new full-site editing option has rendered premium themes, and thus the premium and business plans redundant; the Gutenberg upgrade allowed users on free as well as personal plans to do some of the things that were previously only possible with premium or business plans. But to be honest, the hindsight doesn’t explain why – whose free plan, pro-open-source stance and focus on making publishing technology more democratic made it many a modern (non-technical) blogger’s host of choice – would pull the rug out like this. CEO Dave Martin responded to these concerns on Hacker News, apologizing for the lack of communication in the rollout:
You’re right to call us out. I did a poor job of sharing context around why we are making change, so I can see how they could come as a shock. I’m sorry! That’s on me.
Yes, as of this week we’ve gone from 5 plans down to just 2. That said, we’re not done making changes. This was the first of a couple of phases of changes.
Those 5 older plans that you mentioned were the culmination of like 10 years worth of plans and features sort of haphazardly being added to with no real strategy. With those older plans, it was really hard for customers to see at-a-glance why they should choose one plan over another.
Martin said generally adjusts its subscription plan pricing to make it affordable in different regions of the world but neglected to do so for the new Pro plan. The company is working on updating that.
He also said the traffic limits will “only be enforced on the honor system.” Users who consistently go over the monthly cap will be prodded with notices to pay more, but their sites will not be shut off.
“The Pro plan you see now (at $15/mo) is essentially the the exact same plan as the old Business plan (which used to cost $25/mo),” Martin said. “The only difference being the default storage that is available and a cost savings to customers of $10/mo.” This plan currently has no option for monthly billing.
The cost savings only affects users who were already paying. New users on the free plan will need to work within the confines of the 500MB storage limit or pay $180/year for the upgrade. This is surprising, given how many people use simply to blog with no business interests.
“Again, this may be great for businesses – but it’s a shit move for bloggers,” VM said in his post. “Matt Mullenweg, the CEO of Automattic, which runs, recently said in an interview: ‘I’ll tell you a stat most people don’t realize. Half of all users who sign up for every day are there to blog.’ I’ll tell you that for all of these people as well as the people who are using to blog (including me), the new plan is a betrayal of our interests.”
One Hacker News commenter @username223 noted how easy it will be for users to max out the free tier in a short amount of time:
Cutting the free tier from 3 GB to 500 MB makes it useless for many people: that’s 500 images at okay resolution, and lots of people like to put photos on their blogs. And 300 “visits” (page hits?) per day is almost as bad, as a runaway crawler or minor spike in interest can blow through that in no time.
I moved away from when they started putting ads on the free tier. I thought their business model was upselling some people, so monetizing the free version felt scummy. The fact that they’re crippling the free version now makes me even more glad I moved away.
Martin said has plans to offer some à la carte features that may help new free users avoid having to pay $180/year just to increase storage.
“We will be announcing affordable add-ons for both the free plan and the Pro plan to extend both your traffic and your storage as needed,” Martin said. “In fact, we plan to also add a handful of affordable add-ons to the free plan to make it easy for customers to pick and choose which additional functionality they want, without needing to upgrade to the Pro plan.”
Martin’s responses were reassuring to some users, including the author of the original post. Other found the changes to the free plan to be discouraging, saying “the internet has become gentrified.” The comments on the Hacker News post are a gold mine of feedback from a demographic that has developed strong expectations about blogging for free.
“The point is here that ‘just here to blog’ bloggers like me have been able to pay WP to have a custom domain, some storage, some SEO and some SM tools managed by WP – and nothing else,” user panicpanicpanic said. “But now, to point a custom domain at my WP site, I need to cough up $180/yr. It’s not just the free plan shrinking further, a fact you’re commenting on, but that the sole alternative plan lies at the other extreme.”
It’s not yet clear whether will offer custom domains as an add-on to the free plan or force users to upgrade to the Pro plan. At the time of publishing, no public announcement has been made about the full range of add-ons that will be available. has published a page to its support forums with FAQ’s regarding pricing feedback. The post indicates an announcement may be coming in the next few days after the team has the chance to work out any remaining issues.
This is not good, there should have been more communication from WordPress end. I recently moved to self-hosted sites and looking at the pricing self-hosting is cheaper.
but I think I made some comment not long ago about another loss, don’t remember details now
Have I mentioned that I hate the 21st century? All money, all the time. Can I go back to the 1960s? flower power? an Earth Day that felt optimistic?
Maybe I am just old and grumpy.
I think it’s fair. Honestly I think it’s such a weird phenomenon of people on the internet that they always expect stuff to either be or remain free.
A personal blog can easily run on 500mb and remain free. Just limit your image use (and use webp!) If you’re a (amateur) photographer or something, and need a lot of storage space, you’re either making money with your profession or you already have an expensive hobby, so what’s 15$?
I wouldn’t call it a betrayal. It’s a business, and they’re allowed to make business decisions as they see fit. I think to most people, it’s more important that keeps existing, right? Or should it remain free/cheap and at one point just close its doors?
What I do think is interesting is the visitors cap; with only 100k visits on a premium plan it seems they’re reducing their focus to relatively small sites/businesses?
The description Dave Martin gave in the dotcom forums sounds like a throwback to 10 years ago to the Store, where you paid for “à la carte upgrades” to your site, like No Ads, Custom CSS, Custom Domain, Extra Space. I haven’t yet found a single web hosting provider that works this way today. In my mind, it’s a huge step backwards and I’m still wondering about the reason behind the change.
If I recall, this isn’t the first time .com made some big changes and kinda sorta didn’t announce it to anyone. It shouldn’t be that difficult to communicate these things.
This is not interesting at all, especially for people living in countries under sanctions.
Those adverse to paying new fees for their blogs, may consider upgrading to the Pro Plan or using another CMS, such as In addition to my sites, I run a few niche sites on Those sites are easy to maintain and of this date remain free. You can get a TLD (top level domain) at a decent price through “Google Domains.” Like many items these days, “freebies” are on the way out.
“Like many items these days, “freebies” are on the way out.”
That is a problem, as so many starting out really need free resources—I really like a well-designed freemium plan that gives access to all features at small scale, requiring payment to scale up along with use.
I have not used for quite some time, though still check into our old GetFISARight site (, set up during the first Obama campaign to protest the then-senator’s support for wireless wiretapping, so I am not familiar with the details of the various options. That site was my intro to WordPress; I am now maintaining 3 for various grassroots groups and setting up a 4th, moving materials from another group’s DotNetNuke site.
With the new plan names, it seems like has given up on any pretense of not trying to confuse people about WordPress vs
Why are the plans named “WordPress Free” and “WordPress Pro”?
They should be “Free” and “Pro” or “ Free” and “ Pro”.
Naming them just “WordPress” is clearly designed to prey on people’s confusion even more than they already do.
The SEO is also clearly misleading, as the SEO title is “WordPress Cost | WordPress Price”.
These plans are not the cost or price of WordPress. They are the cost or price of By targeting these keywords and using these plan names, is intentionally tricking people into thinking is the one and only “WordPress”.
This change really shocked me 😦
I would like to update my comment. After I tried upgrading to Pro plan from the legacy Premium plan and comparing it with similar services and some hostings provider both local and global (and other hosted platform as well such as Wix and Weebly), I can say that while the price is not really affordable enough for me (and maybe for some other users), I must admit that the prices, specs, and supports are indeed competitive when I compare it with similar services (managed WordPress hosting).
If I recall, this isn’t the first time .com made some big changes and kinda sorta didn’t announce it to anyone. It shouldn’t be that difficult to communicate these things.
This is not acceptable; WordPress should have communicated more effectively. I recently switched to self-hosted sites, and based on the pricing, self-hosting is less expensive.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

WordPress Tavern is a website about all things WordPress. We cover news and events, write plugin and theme reviews, and talk about key issues within the WordPress ecosystem…
© All Rights Reserved. Powered by WordPress, hosted by Pressable

Affiliate Marketing As A Business


/ Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *